Website Cookies and Tracking: A Cautionary Tale
From junior marketers to CIOs and general counsels, anyone with even the smallest responsibility for web content is bound to be aware of the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR.
The regulation provides six possible lawful reasons for processing this information, but few of these apply to private companies processing data for marketing or user-tracking purposes. Instead, the lawful reason relied on in most cases is where the subject has given their consent to data processing. This is why providing meaningful opportunities to give properly-informed consent, and acting properly when consent is withdrawn or not given, is essential if you want to be GDPR-compliant.
It’s worth bearing in mind that businesses in the US, where specific opt-ins are generally less mandatory, are still required to comply with GDPR when supplying services to users based in the EU. That means that brands need to either apply the most stringent rules universally, to all customers, or else identify users accessing their site from the EU and present them with properly working consents. Whichever route brands choose, we can help to properly implement them, check they are working and compliant, and apply ongoing governance methods.
GDPR applies to anyone who controls, collects or processes personal data – meaning ‘information that relates to an identified or identifiable individual’. This covers everything from patient data held by the NHS to a single shop with a CCTV camera recording people’s faces. However, where many brands we speak to run into trouble is with cookies, tracking pixels, web beacons and other tools that collect personal data, usually in the service of a marketing or site customisation goal.
Instead, brands need to give users information about all the different ways their data is being processed when they use your site and, crucially, give them the opportunity to opt out of each one individually before it is processed. In most cases, that means users must opt-in to having personal information collected, including via cookies, and can’t be blocked from using a service if they don’t opt in.
It also, to state an obvious point that nevertheless catches many brands out, means that when users choose to decline some or all cookies, that choice must be reflected in reality and no cookies placed on their device.
Many brands have complex web real estate that includes multiple websites, microsites and applications, each populated by dozens of cookies and pixels from different advertisers, third parties, and embedded apps. That means it can be a full-time job to maintain meaningful data processing opt-ins that are properly connected to the scripts and pixels they relate to, and truly control whether they are triggered or not.
Failing is easier than you think_
GDPR is a huge topic and unfortunately there are a number of different areas where brands can fall foul of the regulations. One of the biggest reasons you could run into problems is through treating compliance as a one-off job, and not an ongoing effort. That means you may well have been compliant at the time you launched a website or rolled out a new piece of cookie-management software, but over time your website has changed, been updated and fallen out of compliance.
A lot of organisations, for example, use tag management tools such as Cookiepro to implement scripts and marketing trackers for campaigns. And large websites often have multiple teams working on them in relative isolation, each with privileged access granted through a content management system. As a result, it’s not uncommon for us to discover that your well-intentioned marketing or content team has used their CMS access to directly add scripts, trackers or beacons to the website.
The consequences of that seemingly innocuous action can be serious as not only are the resulting scripts not tracked and managed in the official tool, but it’s likely that the opt-in toggles generated by the tool do not control the scripts placed directly into the site. So users who have clearly chosen not to be tracked are in fact being tracked without their knowledge; a serious breach of their trust, and of GDPR.
Compliance. Who cares?
It’s all fine
Perhaps the most obvious answer is that GDPR provides states with the ability to levy very large fines on people who breach the regulations. The maximum fines are the greater of €20 million, or 4% of the company’s annual worldwide turnover from the previous year. While few offenders receive fines of that size in practice, and many are simply issued advice or warnings, some enormous fines have been dished out.
Amazon, for example, was fined €746 million in 2021. The reasons are not public, but are believed to be to do with failing to get proper cookie consent from users - precisely the kind of problem experienced by many of the brands we talk to.
In the UK, household name brands like British Airways and Marriot Hotels have been fined by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for data breaches in circumstances where they were held to be partly at fault for failing to prevent or detect the breach.
Your customers really care
Fines are certainly a major incentive, but increasingly we also find that consumers are very aware of what GDPR permits and does not permit, and very quick to form judgements about brands based on how transparent and trustworthy they are. The last few years have seen high-profile campaigns and viral messaging about poorly-implemented cookie banners, so-called ‘dark patterns’ in sign-ups and check-outs, and data breaches by small and medium companies. Users may not immediately realise whether you have placed cookies on their device without permission, but they’re very sensitive to that sort of breach of trust and, if they do become aware, it can have a disastrous impact on how they perceive you.
Above all, customers like to think that brands want to do the right thing in protecting their users’ privacy and respecting their rights. It may not always be the most convenient option, and it certainly hampers the ability of marketers and advertisers, but long-term it builds trust in your organisation and makes customers far more likely to voluntarily hand over limited amounts of their data in order to buy or receive messaging from you.
A 3-stage process for peace of mind
We’ve work with brands to review websites they believe to be compliant, and help them identify and remedy these hidden issues.
We follow a three stage process of, first, auditing the website. This is done by our in-house data scientists and analysts to make sure we have identified all the possible compliance problems, small and large. We’ll then move to remediation, working with you to prioritise the issues and tackle them. As a full-service digital agency, we have staff on-hand to deal with whatever remedial steps are needed, whether it’s web development, re-designing forms and opt-ins, or re-implementing tracking tools.
Of course, fixing problems isn’t a one-off, so our final step is governance, where we ensure we’ve left you with the tools you need to maintain compliance long-term. We’ve developed continuous controls monitoring (CCM) tools and processes to help ensure that issues don’t creep back in over time.